Saturday, March 31, 2012
Innate Sense of Beauty: Are beauty standards universal?
It appears that people from different cultures share the same standards of beauty because they are innate; we are born with the knowledge of who’s beautiful and who’s not. Two studies conducted in the mid-1980s independently demonstrate that infants as young as two and three months old gaze longer at a face that adults judge to be more attractive than at a face that adults judge to be less attractive. Babies are wonderfully hedonistic and have no manners, so they stare at objects that they consider to be pleasing. When babies stare at some faces longer than others, it indicates that they prefer to look at them and find them attractive.
In the most recent version of this experiment, newborn babies less than one week old show significantly greater preference for faces that adults judge to be attractive. Another study shows that 12-month-old infants exhibit more observable pleasure, more play involvement, less distress, and less withdrawal when interacting with strangers wearing attractive masks than when interacting with strangers wearing unattractive masks. They also play significantly longer with facially attractive dolls than with facially unattractive dolls. The findings of these studies are consistent with the personal experiences and observations of many parents of small children, who find that their children are much better behaved when their babysitters are physically attractive than when they are not.
Even the most ardent proponents of the traditional view that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” must admit that one week (or even a few months) is not nearly enough time for infants to have learned and internalized the (supposedly arbitrary) cultural standards of beauty through socialization and media exposure. These studies instead strongly suggest that the broad standards of beauty might be innate, not learned or acquired through socialization. The balance of evidence indicates that beauty is decidedly not in the eye of the beholder, but might instead be part of universal human nature.
Perhaps, beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, but skin deep!
Turning the Tables
Friday, March 30, 2012
“A woman who lost her life to have a slightly firmer behind.”
Cosmetic Surgery is prevalent in this society, if you are fat, all you need to have is a free day and you can get a marvelous figure in the matter of a liposuction surgery. The perfect looks supersedes the health and existence of live in today's society. A beauty queen who all considered to have the ideal face and body, succumbed to a cosmetic disaster. She is not the only one, many actors, models and even common people want to just get rid of their natural look and get the new look, be it a slender nose or plumper lips, just to look perfect.
Source:http://healthland.time.com/2009/12/01/beauty-queen-dies-after-plastic-surgery/ (2010)
Away from All Those Stuff
Heyes’s underlying point in the article on ethnic cosmetic surgery is that “feminist analysis of cosmetic surgery badly needs to learn the lessons of critical whiteness studies that are already widely integrated into feminist work on other topics.” She continues, “these lessons might direct us to investigate how cosmetic surgery enables white women to appropriate pieces of “ethnic” physicality for their exoticism and eroticism, without risking the oppression that more bodies are marked vulnerable to.”
I guess it is fair to say, according to the quotes, that Heyes sees ethnic cosmetic surgery negatively unless she was being sarcastic to the scholars, mentioned in the article. If we assumed that she was not being sarcastic, I’d say, however, that we can be positive about, put it in their words, white women appropriating “pieces of ‘ethnic’ physicality” of ethnic people and ethnic women “whitenizing” themselves. Let’s say more and more individuals were pursuing this unnatural transformation of appearance through cosmetic surgery. Then, they would be categorized out of categorically exclusive ethnic cultures because they would not be ethnically natural in appearance. This could undermine rigid institutions of traditionalism and ethnic fundamentalism. It seems as if, to some extent, the newly transformed could break away and free themselves from social, cultural, and ethnic features, which are often used to discriminate against in reality. Therefore, it may be a transformation of collectively identified individuals into non-traditional, non-cultural, and non-ethnic individual beings; that is, in my opinion, positive.
Is Sunset Beautiful or Not?
It is hard to describe the feeling that I get when I sit on the sand of Santa Monica beach, with bear foot in the sand, and slightly feeling the fading warmth it saved up for a whole day, and look at the sun slowly dissolving into the sea. I could say that the sunset on such an occasion is beautiful. Perhaps, not many people disagree with me that it is in fact beautiful, yet beauty is subjective, as I understand. And what is ugly about beauty is that it might enforce a certain, notion of beauty upon ourselves through various institutions. Such institutions can be government, religion, culture, arts, education, and etcetera . This gets me thinking about our lectures past few weeks: eating disorder, femininity, and media portrayal of such.
Criticizing on the media for actively and harmfully portraying the expected, desirable appearance of women as skinny does not seem to be the right course to get to the bottom of the problem as to how American women are dissatisfied with their own bodies and that such self-contempt causes eating disorder. As the same logic, talking about how voluptuous women are healthier and more attractive than those skinny does not seem to solve anything as well. So I wonder: why aren’t we talking about such a concept as beauty as our enemy?
Beauty ultimately creates ugliness or vice versa. I am not aware of all the talks on beauty, done by the philosophers ever existed, so I cannot firmly say, but isn’t beauty only existent if compared with ugliness because we wouldn’t be able to figure out whether or not something is beautiful if not compared? Say there is an emerald green colored ocean in front of you. If there were no such thing as beauty, then there would be no ugliness about it. If there were neither beauty nor ugliness, then there would just be this ocean as it is with no subjective judgment on its quality. Similarly, being thinner or thicker, if there were no concept as beauty, wouldn’t that person be just thinner or thicker; and there is nothing negative or positive about it?
Monday, March 26, 2012
Hollywood for the Male Consumer
It has been discussed in discussion that movies tend to be geared towards men. It is actually shockingly true how many movies have surprisingly little female interaction that is not about men. Here's an excellent litmus test to see whether a movie is male biased, which proves the point that many of the movies that even I like seem to be biased towards a man's perspective.
http://www.genderacrossborders.com/2010/03/17/the-bechdel-test-for-women-in-movies/
Yet why is there no uproar from the women? Better yet, why has the female cinema viewer market not been tapped? Many would say that so-called 'chick flicks' that guys roll their eyes over are geared towards women. Indeed, females seem to be the majority of the audience through those features. Yet they don't depict much more than the same story of hopelessly falling in love.
On the other hand, many family-oriented movies don't purposely degrade women. However, by having male characters be consistently in lead roles, society is getting accustomed to this and would find it odd if such genders were reversed.
Such teaching of gender roles through movies starts incredibly early, it seems, with 'harmless' Disney movies. And this teaching is continued throughout adulthood. One fascinating website that shows this continuous brainwashing of every girl desiring a fairytale wedding with Prince Charming coming along is http://www.disneybridal.com/ where customers can choose which Disney princess they desire to imitate. It is a very frightening thought that such obvious training is going on within culture, and it seems as if there is no end to it in the near future. The question to ask, though, is whether such gender training from early on is actually such a terrible thing if it does not interfere with one's health. More to come on this next week!
Advocating for Fat Acceptance
Israel advocates for Healthy Models
Sunday, March 25, 2012
hey you are still eating?
So here is some quotes from her post, which is funny, but somewhat, I'd say, pathetic.
1. Hey you are still eating? Even your mom is thinner than you! Just think about how you feel when you can't squeeze yourself into clothes you love...and now you are still eating?
2. You must be crazy. Don't you remember how people laugh at you, and make fun of you? You've already been eating for all these years...are you going to die without this bite?
3.Look at how slim other girls are. Are you an idiot? Or you are born to be such a pig? Are you happy when your crush is taken away by some hot bitch, leaving you alone in your fat pants?
4. Where did you get the courage to wear dresses with your giant elephant legs?
5. Pigs are fat for money; what are you stocking your fat for?
6. Fat girls have no future! However good you are, you are just an overweight good person.
7. When you are hungry, go to the mirror, you fat bitch!
8. To slim, or to die!
The Unfairness of Contraception
It is also a very big problem that men are given the opportunity to purchase condoms for a few dollars at almost any convince store but in order for a woman to purchase birth control they have to make an appointment to meet with their doctor and pay much more than a few dollars in order to prevent having children. Women also have the burden of paying $50 for emergency contraceptive if for some case they think they may be in danger of being pregnant. This price for the pill should be much lower because women should have an equal opportunity to prevent pregnancy the same way that the men do. The men should not be the only sex that is able to prevent pregnancy with only sparing a few dollars.
Fat is the New Ugly
There was recently an article in Vogue about a mother who put her 7 year old daughter on a drastic diet because her daughter's BMI labeled her as obese. Extreme restriction on impressionable kids' minds is harmful and the consequences are what set up eating disorders later on. Although this woman said that she put her daughter on a diet for health reasons, limiting everything a child eats ruins the fun of being a kid. Instead of teaching moderation and healthy habits by example, she would embarrass her daughter by taking away birthday cake at parties or limit portion sizes at dinner. The CNN article said that children learn more from what their parents do then by what they tell them. So if a child is watching his or her mother limiting her food intake or listening to mom saying "she's been bad because she had a bowl of ice cream", they'll mimic the behavior. This is also considered a gateway to eating disorders, so a well-informed parents should recognize this and watch how their children pick-up on eating cues. Raising a healthy, normal weight, and self confident child is becoming more and more difficult in a society that relates so much to the good and evils of being skinny and fat.
Anorexia: it's all in the brain
Still Victims to the Whims of Men
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Magazine articles
Friday, March 23, 2012
Reasons behind a man's/woman's decision to have cosmetic surgery
Women are not only pressured to compete with other women but also experience a stronger urge to satisfy men's expectations of their bodies. Perhaps the reason why women experience more anxieties than men is the overwhelming social expectations and judgments around gender that restrict women's freedom with the "should’s" and "don'ts" - a woman should stay in the domestic field, don't be too promiscuous - that have trained her to instinctively confirm to what the society thinks is "pure physical beauty" and given her the mentality that she has no freedom to choose how she wants her body to be. And this mentality is deeply enforced by men who buy beauty marketing campaigns then turn to impose the same expectations on women. The clearest evidence of this is the famous viral scandal from USC kappa sigma frat, in which the boys impose a scale on the female body: 10 is equivalent to "the likes of Marissa Miller and Megan Fox. No one will ever get this" while "3-The filth cut-off. These are not attractive women, but sadly many of you have fucked these. 2-Still filth. Still Pathetic" and "1-Anything this close to 0 is bad. You better be 3 four lokos deep to justify this abomination". Our generation has not only been seriously saturated with superficial unrealistic expectation, but has also becoming more criticizing of the female body.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Think Like A Man
Monday, March 5, 2012
17 Again
But the movie raises an interesting approach to male’s presentation of masculinity. Stan, in order to project his masculinity, constantly shows homophobic attitudes and violence; his masculinity is defined by the subordination of socially less-valued types of masculinities. Nonetheless, all of his victims are on the weak side. If he were a true man he would have picked on someone of his own size. As Mark pointed out later that “underneath all those male brovado, there’s an insecure little girl just banging on the closet door trying to get out”. Hence, masculinity is just a product of insecurity, of fear of being recognized as the weak, feminine one in the world of men.
The movie also depicts how women are often seen as burdens to men’s success. For all his failures in life, Mike blame his wife for his lost opportunities, all things that he could have done without her. When his wife told him that he didn’t have to marry her in the first place, Mike answered “Yeah, but I did”, as if marrying her was an act of justice, a favor he did for her. Moreover, it portrays how society limits the rights of women and its skeptical, harsh judgment on them. When Mike’s wife was finally starting out fresh by looking for new man, Mike commented that: “if this was Afghanistan she’d be dragged to the street by goats with her hands cut off for planning on running around with every guy she can get her hands on”. Thus, even though we lived in a developed, civilized society, many of us are still narrow-minded on the subject of gender and equality, and allowing old-fashioned stereotypes and generalizations to be the foundations of our perceptions.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Gender Dysphoria
There was also a case decades ago in which a boy's penis was destroyed during a circumcision procedure, and the doctors made the decision to perform sex reassignment surgery on him, forcing him to take female hormones for the rest of his life and instructing his parents to raise him as a girl. This became a great source of trauma for him, and after finding out the truth about himself, he went back to living his life as a man before eventually committing suicide in his 40s.
What is gender, and by extension, gender dysphoria, beyond their dictionary and medical definitions? What does it feel like to be one sex yet desire to be another? I wish I had answers to these questions, because they would help me a lot in understanding what my friend has been going through. It seems easier to recognize oneself as identifying as the opposite gender, because society has clearly defined definition for what each gender is, and it seems identification has to do with mentally fitting these definitions. But what is it that creates gender identity? It seems socialization and biology are not quite enough to determine some people's identifications. My friend mentioned in the first paragraph has higher than average levels of testosterone compared to most other women, but she was still raised as a woman. Is there, then, some other intangible measure of identity that somehow separates humanity down a line? According to most discussions we have had in our classes, this dichotomy does not exist naturally, but why is it that some people can identify as "the opposite," then?
The Peculiarities of Having Feminist Friends
As of late, I have considered myself a feminist - someone who supports and believes in the full equality in society for women as well as men. Some of my closer friends have discovered SWMS classes in their freshman year, and have changed majors from pre-med to gender studies as a cause of this discovery. Even though I've touched on feminism in previous classes (Classes entitled "Gender, Sexuality, and the Media" and projects in Institute of Multimedia Literacy (see the video project I helped make with a partner: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOuu9WQk7cM )), I have never had the opportunity to explore it as much as in this class so far.
Now, finally, references they make ("Did you know that Lady Gaga's "Paparazzi" is about her having daddy issues?") and events they invite me to (which you should also go to this Thursday:
http://www.facebook.com/events/386973374649171/) make more sense and are so much more interesting.
If I wouldn't be in my third year into Mechanical Engineering, I would also consider maybe switching to a major in SWMS, or at least add a minor in it. It's a fascinating issue that concerns us even today in the modern world.
Rap Music
Several rappers refer to women as "bitches" and "hoes" in their songs as a way to show hegemonic masculinity. Drake's song "The Motto" is a perfect illustration of this. Even though the songs start off with a message from Drake's mother, all the rappers in the song all speak about the money they have and their lyrics show how masculine they are. The portrayal of women is the same by all the rappers and by calling them "bitches" and "hoes" and speaking about their money, cars and "bling" they show signs of hegemonic masculinity.
"Players" vs. "Hoes" ...
It all depends on what society has a view for because it could easily be the opposite sex's way of looking at it. But because of the patriarchal society, it is seen as a good thing by society when a man has experienced more than one sexual partner throughout their life. This is the reason why when a girl believes that in society's eyes that she has had too many sexual partners, many will try to settle down to find a relationship or even marriage. Men usually do not do this because it is not looked down upon by mostly the male society. Some women would not feel good if they found out that the man they were dating had more than six partners because they may feel that he has been with too many women for her. This is a problem in society because it may look down upon either women who have had "too many" partners, or a man who has had "too little" partners.
How come she can marry the Mr. Right?
I do appreciate their good intention that calls for young women to understand the value of studying and hard working, and I agree that beauty will fade, and what lasts forever is brain and disposition. However, they seem to set their argument on a wrong basis. Women try to make better self out of the process of learning, not because study will become the stepping stone on the road of marrige, but because it is the wealth of the whole life time. People who wrote these stuff planted gender inequality in their head at the very beginning. They don't believe marriage is a reciprocal choice; they take for granted that women aim for the better just to be advantaged when they wait in line for some successful guy to throw marriage upon them. I am not sure if this inherent stereotype exists exclusively in China and Asia, or it still dominates the gender structure around the world. Anyways, I respect those women who regard marriage and family life as the ultimate goal in their life; it is a personal choice that makes a lot of sense. However, I hope they don't degrade and objectify themselves. They too, as any man does, have the equal rights in marriage, instead of doing everything possible to please their potential partners as if they are some fancy commodities waiting for the mercy of some random guys.
Obama's birth control mandate
Whistle-blowing and Masculinity
On the one hand, a lot of people historically seem to have believed that they should not "rat" on someone of their association, for it was seen betraying, cowardly, and humiliating. On the other hand, as we find movies such as the Informant and the Whistleblower, such an act seems nowadays to be considered just, brave, and admirable. Whether or not which view is just is left for an individual choice, the question here is: what is a crisis that caused all this? Obviously, I will not investigate this further now, but thought it was interesting.