After
our talk about Hanne Blank’s book and Gayle Rubin’s article in class and in
discussion last week, I found so many things interesting. For one, I found the
rankings interesting. The fact that they put the heterosexual people above all
emphasizes the social construction and preference towards them. What I found surprising
it that the gays, lesbians and transgendered are not in the same category at
the bottom. They are actually separated, with the transgendered being above the
gays and lesbians. This made me wonder and think back on an article I read in
which it stated that people are always ambivalent at deciding whether a baby
dressed in neutral colors is a boy or a girl. During class, as well, Professor Halberstam
mentioned the uncertainty that people feel about themselves and the world that
revolves them if they do not have clarity of what gender someone is. For this
reason, I feel like the ranking of the gender identities is as described. Because
gays and lesbians have a determined sex preference, they seem to be more
accepted than transgendered individuals.
What
interested me more, however, was the fact that heterosexuality gained the top
rank when it wasn’t until the late 1860’s that it was first thought of. This
can be because it was the most useful for survival and evolution.
Heterosexuality promoted the union of a man and a woman that would result in
many offspring. These would make the work force of the world. Because the other
genders weren’t essential to the creation of babies, then they were not valued
enough and thus came about the order of the rankings that were explained in
Rubin’s essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment